Guest post: “What should everyone know about paleontology?”, by Tom Holtz

February 7, 2011

We’ve been running SV-POW! for three and half years now; in all that time we’ve never featured a guest post, because we think it’s better to keep a blog tight and focussed.  In general, that remains our policy.

But today, first the first and maybe only time, we present a guest post.  This article, What should everyone know about paleontology?, was first posted on the Dinosaur Mailing List, by Tom Holtz, in response to a question from Robert Takata.  We are now pleased to present it, in revised and expanded form.

Tom is best known for his work on those vulgar, overstudied theropods, the tyrannosaurs — their phylogenetic position (he was the first to demonstrate that they are coelurosaurs, a position now universally accepted), ecology (he gently but emphatically rebutted Jack Horner’s bafflingly popular Obligate Scavenger hypothesis), and much more.  But Tom is more than a tyrannosaur jockey: he’s one of the most natural teachers I’ve even known, and it’s largely due to his seeming inexhaustible stream of helpful explanations on the dinosaur mailing list that I ever made it past the Dino-Fanboy level into the world of actual science — in fact, I mentioned him in the acknowledgements of my dissertation for that very reason.  So it’s fitting that he, of all people, should be the first ever SV-POW! guest writer.

Take it away, Tom!

“What Should Everyone Know About Paleontology?”

Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.

The title question was recently asked by Roberto Takata on the Dinosaur Mailing List (http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Feb/msg00020.html).

I think that is a good question. What really are the most important elements of paleontology that the general public should understand? I took a shot at coming up with a list of key concepts (http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Feb/msg00027.html and http://dml.cmnh.org/2011Feb/msg00029.html), based on experiences with teaching paleontology and historical geology and with less-formally structured outreach to the public. I have offered this list (cross posted at the Superoceras and Archosaur Musings blogs) as a way for it to reach a wider audience. That this is Darwin Week makes it even more appropriate, as we should use this occasion to encourage a better understanding of the changes of Earth and Life through Time for the public at large.

Much as I might like to think otherwise, the specific details of the hindlimb function of Tyrannosaurus rex or the pneumatic features of brachiosaurid vertebrae really are not the most important elements of the field. Understanding and appreciating the nitty gritty details of the phylogeny and anatomy of any particular branch of the Tree of Life are not really necessary for everyone to know, any more than we would regard detailed knowledge of bacterial biochemistry or the partitioning of minerals in a magma chamber to be significant general knowledge. (Indeed, these latter two items are actually far more critical for human society than any specific aspect of paleontology, and so from a certain point of view really more important for people to know than the History of Life.)

That said, all human societies and many individuals have wondered about where we have come from and how the world came to be the way it is. This is, in my opinion, the greatest contribution of paleontology: it gives us the Story of Earth and Life, and especially our own story.

I have divided this list into two sections. The first is a list of general topics of paleontology, touching on the main elements of geology that someone would need to know for fossils to make any sense. The second is the more specific list of key points in the history of life.

(NOTE: as the idea of this list is that it should be aimed at the general public, I have tried to avoid technical terminology where possible.)

General

  • That rocks are produced by various factors (erosion -> sedimentation; metamorphism; volcanic activity; etc.)
  • That rocks did not form at a single moment in time, but instead have been and continue to be generated throughout the history of the planet.
  • That fossils are remains of organisms or traces of their behavior recorded in those rocks.
  • That rocks (and the organisms that made the fossils) can be thousands, millions, or even billions of years old.
  • That the species discovered as fossils, and the communities of organisms at each place and time, are different from the same in the modern world and from each other.
  • That despite these differences that there is continuity between life in the past and life in the present: this continuity is a record of the evolution of life.
  • That we can use fossils, in conjunction with anatomical, molecular, and developmental data of living forms, to reconstruct the evolutionary pattern of life through time.
  • That fossils are incomplete remains of once-living things, and that in order to reconstruct how the organisms that produced them actually lived, we can:
    • Document their anatomy (both gross external and with the use of CT scanning internal), and compare them to the anatomy of living creatures in order to estimate their function;
    • Examine their chemical composition, which can reveal aspects of their biochemistry;
    • Examine their microstructure to estimate patterns of growth;
    • Model their biomechanical functions using computers and other engineering techniques;
    • Investigate their footprints, burrows, and other traces to reveal the motion and other actions of the species while they were alive;
    • And collect information of the various species that lived together in order to reconstruct past communities.
  • However, with all that, fossils are necessarily incomplete, and there will always be information about past life which we might very much want to know, but which has been forever lost. Accepting this is very important when working with paleontology.
  • That environments of the past were different from the present.
  • That there have been episodes of time when major fractions of the living world were extinguished in a very short period of time: such data could not be known without the fossil record.
  • That entire branches of the tree of life have perished (sometimes in these mass extinction events, sometimes more gradually).
  • That certain modes of life (reef formers, fast-swimming marine predators, large-bodied terrestrial browsers, etc.) have been occupied by very different groups of organisms at different periods of Earth History.
  • That every living species, and every living individual, has a common ancestor with all other species and individuals at some point in the History of Life.

Specific

Honestly, despite the fact the specific issues about specific parts of the Tree of Life are the ones that paleontologists, the news media, the average citizen, etc., are more concerned with, they really are much less significant for the general public to know than the points above. Sadly, documentary companies and the like keep on forgetting that, and keep on forgetting that a lot of the public does not know the above points.

Really, in the big picture, the distinction between dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and crurotarsans are trivialities compared to a basic understanding that the fossil record is our document of Life’s history and Earth’s changes.

Summarizing the key points of the history of life over nearly 4 billion years of evolutionary history is a big task. After all, there is a tendency to focus on the spectacular and sensationalized rather than the ordinary and humdrum. As Stephen Jay Gould and others often remarked, from a purely objective external standpoint we have always lived in the Age of Bacteria, and the changing panoply of animals and plants during the last half-billion years have only been superficial changes.

But the question wasn’t “what should a dispassionate outsider regard as the modal aspect of the History of Life?”; it was “What should everyone know about paleontology?” Since we are terrestrial mammals of the latest Cenozoic, we have a natural interest in events on the land and during the most recent parts of Earth History. That is a fair bias: it does focus on who WE are and where WE come from.

That said, here is a list of key concepts in the history of life. Other researchers might pick other moments, and not include some that I have here. Still, I believe most such lists would have many of the same key points within them.

  • Life first developed in the seas, and for nearly all of its history was confined there.
  • For most of Life’s history, organisms were single-celled only. (And today, most of the diversity remains single-celled).
  • The evolution of photosynthesis was a critical event in the history of Earth and Life; living things were able to affect the planet and its chemistry on a global scale.
  • Multicellular life evolved independently several times.
  • Early animals were all marine forms.
  • The major groups of animals diverged from each other before they had the ability to make complex hard parts.
  • About 540 million years ago, the ability to make hard parts became possible across a wide swath of the animal tree of life, and a much better fossil record happened.
  • Plants colonized land in a series of stages and adaptations. This transformed the surface of the land, and allowed for animals of various groups to follow afterwards.
  • For the first 100 million years or so of skeletonized animals, our own group (the vertebrates) were relatively rare and primarily suspension feeders. The evolution of jaws allowed our group to greatly diversify, and from that point onward vertebrates of some form or other have remained apex predators in most marine environments.
  • Complex forests of plants (mostly related to small swampland plants of today’s world) covered wide regions of the lowlands of the Carboniferous.
  • Burial of this vegetation before it could decay led to the formation of much of the coal that powered the Industrial Revolution and continues to power the modern world.
  • While most of the coal swamp plants required a moist ground surface on which to propagate, one branch evolved a method of reproduction using a seed. This adaptation allowed them to colonize the interiors, and seed plants have long since become the dominant form of land plant.
  • In the coal swamps, one group of arthropods (the insects) evolved the ability to fly. From this point onward insects were to be among the most common and diverse land animals.
  • Early terrestrial vertebrates were often competent at moving around on land as adults, but typically had to go back to the water in order to reproduce. In the coal swamps one branch of these animals evolved a specialized egg that allowed them to reproduce on land, and thus avoid this “tadpole” stage.
  • These new terrestrial vertebrates—the amniotes—diversified into many forms. Some included the ancestors of modern mammals; others the ancestors of today’s reptiles (including birds).
  • A tremendous extinction event, the largest in the age of animals, devastated the world about 252 million years ago. Caused by the effects and side-effects of tremendous volcanoes, it radically altered the composition of both marine and terrestrial communities.
  • In the time after this Permo-Triassic extinction, reptiles (and especially a branch that includes the ancestors of crocodilians and dinosaurs) diversified and became ecologically dominant in most medium- to large-sized niches.
  • During the Triassic many of the distinctive lineages of the modern terrestrial world (including turtles, mammals, crocodile-like forms, lizard-like forms, etc.) appeared. Other groups that would be very important in the Mesozoic but would later disappear (such as pterosaurs and (in the seas) ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs) evolved at this time.
  • Dinosaurs were initially a minor component of these Triassic communities. Only the tall, long-necked sauropodomorphs were ecologically diverse during this time among the various dinosaur branches. However, a mass extinction event at the end of the Triassic (essentially the Permo-Triassic extinction in miniature) allowed for the dinosaurs to diversify as their competitors had vanished.
  • During the Jurassic, dinosaurs diversified. Some grew to tremendous size; some evolved spectacular armor; some become the largest carnivorous land animals the world had seen by this point. Among smaller carnivorous dinosaurs, an insulating covering of feathers had evolved to cover the body (possibly from a more ancient form shared by all dinosaurs). Among the feathered dinosaurs were the ancestors of the birds.
  • Other terrestrial groups such as pterosaurs, crocodile-ancestors, mammals, and insects continued to diversify into new habits.
  • During the Jurassic and (especially) the Cretaceous, a major transformation of marine life occurred. Green-algae phytoplankton were displaced by red-algae phytoplankton (which continue to dominate modern marine ecosystems). A wide variety of new predators—advanced sharks and rays, teleost fish, predatory snails, crustaceans with powerful claws, specialized echinoids, etc.—appeared, and the sessile surface-dwelling suspension feeders that dominated the shallow marine communities since the Ordovician became far rarer. Instead, more mobile, swimming, or burrowing forms became more common.
  • During the Cretaceous one group of land-plants evolved flowers and fruit and thus tied their reproduction very closely with animals. Although not immediately ecologically dominant, this type of plants would eventually come to be the major land plant group.
  • The impact of a giant asteroid—coupled with other major on-going environmental changes—brought an end to the Mesozoic. Most large-bodied groups on land and sea, and many smaller bodied forms, disappeared. The only surviving dinosaurs were toothless birds.
  • The beginning of the Cenozoic saw the establishment of mammals as the dominant group of large-bodied terrestrial vertebrates. Early on mammals colonized both the sea and the air as well.
  • During its beginning the Cenozoic world was warm and wet, much like the Cretaceous. However, a number of changes of the position of the continents and the rise of mountain ranges caused the climates to cool and dry.
  • As the world cooled and dried, great grasslands developed (first in South America, and later nearly all other continents).
  • Various groups of animals adapted to the new grassland conditions. Herbivorous mammals became swift runners with deep-crowned teeth, often living in herds for protection. Mammalian predators became swifter as well, some becoming pack hunters.
  • Other new plant communities evolved, and new animal communities which inhabited them. The rise of modern meadows (dominated by daisy-related plants and grasses) saw the diversification of mouse-and-rat type rodents, many frogs and toads, advanced snakes, songbirds, etc.
  • A group of arboreal mammals with very big brains, complex social communities, and gripping hands—the primates—produced many forms. In Africa one branch of these evolved to live at mixed forest-grassland margins, and from this branch evolved some who became fully upright and moved out into the grasslands.
  • This group of primates retained and advanced the ability to use stone tools that its forest-dwelling ancestors already had. Many branches evolved, and some developed even larger brains and more complex tools. It is from among these that the ancestors of modern humans and other close relatives evolved, and eventually spread out from Africa to other regions of the planet.
  • About 2.6 million years ago a number of factors led to ice age conditions, where glaciers advanced and retreated. Various groups of animals evolved adaptations for these new cold climates.
  • The early humans managed to colonize much of the planet; shortly after their arrival into new worlds, nearly all the large-bodied native species disappeared.
  • At some point before the common ancestor of all modern humans spread across the planet, the ability to have very complex symbolic language evolved. This led to many, many technological and cultural diversifications which changed much faster than the biology of the humans themselves.
  • In western Asia and northern Africa (and eventually in other regions), modern humans developed techniques to grow food under controlled circumstances, leading to true agriculture. (Other cultures are known to have independently evolved proto-agricultural techniques).
  • This Neolithic revolution allowed for the development of more settled communities, specialization of individual skills within a community (including soldiers, metallurgists, potters, priests, rulers, and with the rise of writing, scribes).
  • From this point we begin to get a written record, and so the historians can take up the story…

This list is obviously not comprehensive, and there are many elements that I had to ignore to keep it relatively short. Still, I hope this overview helps put where we as a species fit into the larger perspective of Life’s long voyage, a voyage that could only have been traced by the study of fossils.

Advertisements

26 Responses to “Guest post: “What should everyone know about paleontology?”, by Tom Holtz”


  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bora Zivkovic, Brian Switek, Michael Barton, Peter MacKenzie, Cristi and others. Cristi said: RT @Laelaps: Tyrannosaur expert Thomas Holtz explains what everyone should know about paleontology http://bit.ly/hpoRyj […]


  2. […] blogs have reprinted it, so if you want to read it (you really should) go to Archosaur Musings or Sauropod Vertebrae Picture of the Week. I was lucky enough to take a class from Dr. Holtz in one of my post-bacc semesters at the […]

  3. Sarah Says:

    I think that this could be made into a nice youtube video, if we could find someone to read it aloud, and a good series of images to play while it was going on.

  4. Joe Andersen Says:

    Sad as it is, I think this list needs to include a statement along the lines of

    “Fossils are formed from the remains of creatures that lived and died a very long time ago – most died indisputably more than 6000 years ago”

    I know that this is sor tof in the first few points but I think specifics work best in some situations.

  5. Ashley Says:

    Even in my museum tours (which focus on dinosaurs) I have approximately 1/2 an hour to convey the importance of dinosaurs to the general public (multi-generational families) so I have to be concise and make it exciting at the same time (which isn’t hard to do with dinosaurs). I’m always researching and trying to inspire people to learn more about science and not burden them with the hard and heavy information.

    My #1 go-to guide–besides the DML, scientific papers, etc–is Tom Holtz’s Dinosaur Encyclopedia. He’s such a great speaker/writer.

    Teachers need a stronger science background. Period. We need more kids interested in science!

    Ashley

  6. cromercrox Says:

    The one thing that lazy, ignorant news media need to know is that there is no such thing as a ‘missing link’.


  7. Sarah: given sufficient time (i.e., NOT during teaching season…) and with sufficient video help, I’d be happy to record something like this. It’s not like I lack experience in doing audio recordings:
    http://www.thetwentyfirstfloor.com/?p=1317
    and
    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/12/bizarre-dinosaurs/holtz-dinosaur-photography

    for instance.

  8. Dane Deasy Says:

    Great list!

    Why is that some people still dispute evolution?

    It seems so clear cut as to be intuitive. Can anyone explain?

  9. Tony Sidaway Says:

    I’m helping my adult daughter, who missed a lot of school, to make sense of a recent PhD level paper on reptilian systematics–in essence, where do the reptiles fit in the evolution of the tetrapods and how are the living reptiles related to ancestral forms. It’s been a learning experience for both of us–surprising how enthusiastic amateurs can learn the language and understand the often highly nuanced issues.

    Although we both already understand much of what Tom writes about above, it’s great to have such a concise and broad summary that touches on matters we’ve recently been studying in some detail. I’ve recommended this essay to her.


  10. Off topic and nitpicky, but as an expert on vulgar, overstudied creatures, I must correct your statement Holtz was the first to identify tyrannosaurs as coelurosaurs. As Holtz himself said in his famous 1994 paper, Huene had the idea in the 1920s and Bakker and Novas among others followed it in the 1980s. He certainly popularized the idea though.

    And that, my friends, is a paleontological fact it’s not necessary for everybody to know. ;)

  11. Mike Taylor Says:

    Mickey, thanks for the nit-pick. I changed the wording to “the first to demonstrate that they are coelurosaurs”.

  12. Nathan Myers Says:

    Do these last two postings presage the renaissance and new efflorescence of SV-POW? They make a darned good start.

    Someday, the privilege of guest-posting on SV-POW will be as sought-after and bitterly contested as publication in Nature. Get in now while you still can.

  13. Mathew Wedel Says:

    Do these last two postings presage the renaissance and new efflorescence of SV-POW? They make a darned good start.

    All I can say right now is, this statement is going to look awfully prophetic in a few weeks. Stay tuned, true believers.


  14. “All I can say right now is, this statement is going to look awfully prophetic in a few weeks. Stay tuned, true believers.”

    Awesome! Looking forward to that.

  15. Mark Robinson Says:

    “…the pneumatic features of brachiosaurid vertebrae really are not the most important elements of the field.”

    Dr Holtz, really! On this blog of all blogs. Nonetheless, apart from this short piece of blasphemy, another excellent post.

    Matt, I do hope so. I really miss the days of yore when we were treated to entertaining and informative posts from you guys every few days.

  16. Gail Black Says:

    Thanks for publishing this article. Concise and simplistic enough for the average person to understand and appreciate.


  17. […] What should people know about dinosaurs? Ok, I admit, I never entirely outgrew the “dinosaurs are neat!” phase of my childhood, but I’m actually equally fascinated by the question of “What *should* people know about a particular subject, and how do we figure that out?” So, imagine my delight in getting a pointer to a post that combines the two. Tom Holz (a paleontologist who focuses on the tyrannosaurus rex) has written a guest post about that very topic, with both general and specific things he thinks people ought to know about the field and why they matter. […]


  18. […] with less-formally structured outreach to the public. I have offered this list (cross posted at the Sauropod Vertebrae Picture of the Week, Dave Hone’s Archosaur Musings, Crurotarsi: The Forgotten Archosaurs, and Superoceras blogs) […]


  19. I have some doubts about this statement:
    “The early humans managed to colonize much of the planet; shortly after their arrival into new worlds, nearly all the large-bodied native species disappeared”
    While one could argue so for Oceania and the America’s (but even there it is contested – timing similarity of megafauna extinction with Eurasia suggest changing climate is the factor in the Americas, not humans), it certainly is not true for Eurasia. Early human ancestors arrived there 1 million years ago, but the Eurasian megafauna did not die out. And while Eurasian Neandertals (about 130000-35000 bp) are known to have been top predators, they did not manage to extinguish the Eurasian megafauna either. The latter only disappeared about 12000 years ago, at a moment climate was changing, leading to the disappearance of once widespread biotopes vital for these herds of mammoth etc.
    While the overkill hypothesis of Martin c.s. has some following among paleontologists, it has virtually nil support by archaeologists. Simply because it never has fit comfortably with the evidence.

  20. piotrus Says:

    May I suggest that the author of this blog post contributes his knowledge to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleontology ? Wikipedia articles are the most common place people who want to learn basics on some subjects turn to, and his gift at making important things obvious would be much welcome there.


  21. Maybe in my mythical “copious free time”. In general, I encourage others to deal with wikis, since I’m always behind on other writing as it is…

    As for the “overkill”: this was a simplified document. Yes, subboreal Eurasia and Africa (those regions longest in contact with humans and near-humans) do not experience these extinctions. However, the other parts of the world DO coincide with the either the first major human arrivals or some technical transformation of humans. In contrast, they only occasionally match a particular climate shift, and absolutely none of the climate shifts they might be associated with are of any greater or more intense scale than others that the very same species survived multiple times before.

    As those of us who work on issues of predation before humans are even an issue can attest, direct physical evidence of hunting can be vanishingly rare in the ancient record, particularly when no tool-use butchery takes place.

    I don’t think anyone considers humans alone as the sole agent of Quaternary megafaunal extinctions, but human agency seems to be the sole new factor in the wave of extinctions.


  22. P.S. If any wikipedians are willing to use this post as the traced source, you can harvest relevant information (with attribution) for the site.


  23. […] am sure was deliberate. Most people who are interested in this sort of thing have undoubtedly seen Tom Holtz’s “What Everyone Should Know About Paleontology” that was flying around the internet a few weeks ago. It’s been well discussed elsewhere, but I […]


  24. […] into the stirrup-shaped stapes and anteoribital openings. Do these really make the short list of  things that everybody must know about the evolution of life? There was no mention of how to apply this information. For example, the exhibit, near as I could […]


  25. […] I’ll admit it can be difficult, but I get by because using one proviso-free name for the Maryland sauropod seems to be  informative and helpful to my audience. I only have people’s attention for so long, and I’d rather not spend that time on tangents about how Astrodon should really be called Pluerocoelus or why my use of either name is imprecise and problematic. I want visitors to walk away understanding how paleontologists assemble clues from sedimentary structures and anatomical comparisons to reconstruct ancient environments and their inhabitants. I’d like for visitors to practice making observations and drawing conclusions, and understand how paleontology is a meticulous science that can be relevant to their lives. “Paleontologists are weirdly obsessed with changing names” is not one of the most important things to know about paleontology. […]


  26. […] are some great pieces on what paleontology is and why it’s important: “What should everyone know about paleontology?” by dinosaur expert Tom Holtz Jr. “Why Paleontology is Relevant” by evolutionary biologist […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: