Brachiosaurus altithorax, fossils in the field

June 3, 2014

Continuing our Brachiosaurus series [part 1part 2part 3part 4part 5part 6, part 7], here is another historically important photo scanned from the Glut encyclopaedia: this time, from Supplement 1 (2000), page 157.

Glut2000-p157--brachiosaurus-altithorax-quarry

This is the Brachiosaurus altithorax holotype FMNH P25107 in the field, at Grand Junction, Colorado, in 1900. Clearly visible are the seven presacral vertebrae running across the middle of the photo (upside-down, so we see their ventral surfaces), several ribs on either side, and the end of a long-bone to the left — most likely the distal end of the femur.  The flat bone at bottom left is probably part of the ilium, with the circular cut-out being the acetabulum. (The caption also mentions the sacrum, which I can’t see.)

As with the photo of the mounted skeleton in the museum, this is one of the Field Museum’s own photos — neg. #4027 — but I can’t find a better copy online. It’s got to be out there somewhere — can anyone help?

References

Glut, Donald F. 2000. Dinosaurs: The Encyclopedia: Supplement 1. McFarland & Company, Inc., Jefferson, North Carolina. 442 pages.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Brachiosaurus altithorax, fossils in the field”

  1. Nima Says:

    Apparently the sacrum is the region just below the rock that has the wooden sign “field columbian museum” on it. How the right ilium got ripped off of the thing is hard to say. Also the distal end of the femur is jutting out to the left.

    This is a very interesting picture. Ribs everywhere. There’s only one partial rib with the present holotype, right? What happened to all those other ribs? Were they really vandalized/stolen as Riggs (1903) seems to imply?

  2. Mike Taylor Says:

    I just re-read Riggs 1903, and couldn’t find any reference to ribs of the Brachiosaurus holotype having been vandalised or stolen. What passage are you referring to?


  3. […] recent photo posts on the mounted Brachiosaurus skeleton and its bones in the ground, I’ve lamented that the Field Museum’s online photo archive is so unhelpful: for […]

  4. Nima Says:

    Oops, sorry Mike. My mistake. There was a report from the US department of the Interior that some of the other remains on Riggs hill were vandalized, but apparently the ribs of the holotype were recovered by Riggs. They were just never published as scale figures or photos except the proximal end of one of them.

    I’ve never seen the other ribs outside of the excavation pics – not in museum setting photos nor figured in any paper.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: