The paper
- Taylor, Michael P., and Mathew J. Wedel. 2013. Why sauropods had long necks; and why giraffes have short necks. PeerJ 1:e36. 41 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables. doi:10.7717/peerj.36
Preprint on arXiv
Before this paper was published in PeerJ, we posted a preprint on arXiv, a service that is used ubiquitously in maths, physics and astronomy, but less often in biology. (The existence of this preprint in 2012 is why the URL of this page has that year in it.) The reference for the preprint is:
- Taylor, Michael P., and Mathew J. Wedel. 2012. Why sauropods had long necks; and why giraffes have short necks. arXiv:1209.5439. 39 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables.
SV-POW! posts
The first three of these were posted when the arXiv preprint was the only publicly available version. The remainder were posted after publication in PeerJ.
- Why giraffes have short necks
- Posting palaeo papers on arXiv
- Mammals have short necks because of local maxima
- PeerJ launches today! (and we’re in it!)
- Terrifying hypothetical cervical vertebrae of the Morrison Formation (and see also Terrifying actual cervical vertebrae of the Morrison Formation)
- Open peer-review at PeerJ
- Personal milestones: publishing the Ph.D
- How disruptive is PeerJ?
- Get your relative-lengths-of-sauropod-necks T-shirts!
Elsewhere on the Web
- Why don’t giraffes have necks as long as a Brachiosaurus? [BoingBoing]
- PeerJ leads a high-quality, low-cost new breed of open-access publisher [Guardian; by Mike]
- PeerJ and Why Giraffes Have Short Necks
- How PeerJ Is Changing Everything In Academic Publishing [TechDirt; by Mike]
- PeerJ 発進 [in Japanese: “Starting PeerJ”] (Google translation)
- Why a dinosaur neck dominates the front of PeerJ for our first “issue” [PeerJ blog]
- El cuello de 15 metros del Supersaurus [DinoAstur. In Spanish: “The 15-meter neck of Supersaurus“] (Google translation)
- How Dinosaurs Grew the World’s Longest Necks [Live Science]
- Dinosaur Reproduction, Not Ancient Gravity, Allowed Super-Sized Sauropods to Evolve [Laelaps at National Geographic]
- New Theory Tries To Explain Why Dinosaurs Grew So Huge — Especially Their Amazing Necks [Geekosystem]
- Los largos cuellos de algunos dinosaurios se explicarían por sus huesos huecos [Tendencias. In Spanish: “The long necks of some dinosaurs are explained by their hollow bones”] (Google translation)
- Giraffes Have Short Necks Compared to Sauropods. Learn Why and How. [Tumblehome Talks]
High-resolution figures
The following high-resolution versions of the figures from the paper are for the benefit of scientists and reporters. Feel free to reproduce or modify these (with attribution) for use in scientific scholarly literature and elsewhere.

Figure 1. Necks of long-necked non-sauropods, to scale. The giraffe and Paraceratherium are the longest necked mammals; the ostrich is the longest necked extant bird; Therizinosaurus and Gigantoraptor are the largest representatives of two long-necked theropod clades; Arambourgiania is the longest necked pterosaur; and Tanystropheus has a uniquely long neck relative to torso length. Human head modified from Gray’s Anatomy (1918 edition, fig. 602). Giraffe modified from photograph by Kevin Ryder (CC BY, http://flic.kr/p/cRvCcQ). Ostrich modified from photograph by “kei51” (CC BY, http://flic.kr/p/cowoYW). Paraceratherium modified from Osborn (1923, figure 1). Therizinosaurus modified from Nothronychus reconstruction by Scott Hartman. Gigantoraptor modified from Heyuannia reconstruction by Scott Hartman. Arambourgiania modified from Zhejiangopterus reconstruction by Witton & Naish (2008, figure 1). Tanystropheus modified from reconstruction by David Peters. Alternating blue and pink bars are 1 m tall.

Figure 2. Full skeletal reconstructions of selected long-necked non-sauropods, to scale. 1, Paraceratherium. 2, Therizinosaurus. 3, Gigantoraptor. 4, Elasmosaurus. 5, Tanystropheus. Elasmosaurus modified from Cope (1870, plate II, figure 1). Other image sources as for Fig. 1. Scale bar = 2 m.

Figure 3. Necks of long-necked sauropods, to scale. Diplodocus, modified from elements in Hatcher (1901, plate 3), represents a “typical” long-necked sauropod, familiar from many mounted skeletons in museums. Puertasaurus, Sauroposeidon, Mamenchisaurus and Supersaurus modified from Scott Hartman’s reconstructions of Futalognkosaurus, Cedarosaurus, Mamenchisaurus and Supersaurus respectively. Alternating pink and blue bars are one meter in width. Inset shows Fig. 1 to the same scale.

Figure 4. Extent of soft tissue on ostrich and sauropod necks. 1, ostrich neck in cross section from Wedel (2003, figure 2). Bone is white, air-spaces are black, and soft tissue is grey. 2, hypothetical sauropod neck with similarly proportioned soft-tissue. (Diplodocusvertebra silhouette modified from Paul 1997, figure 4A). The extent of soft tissue depicted greatly exceeds that shown in any published life restoration of a sauropod, and is unrealistic. 3, More realistic sauropod neck. It is not that the soft-tissue is reduced but that the vertebra within is enlarged, and mass is reduced by extensive pneumaticity in both the bone and the soft-tissue.

Figure 5. Simplified myology of that sauropod neck, in left lateral view, based primarily on homology with birds, modified from Wedel and Sanders (2002, figure 2). Dashed arrows indicate muscle passing medially behind bone. A, B. Muscles inserting on the epipophyses, shown in red. C, D, E. Muscles inserting on the cervical ribs, shown in green. F, G. Muscles inserting on the neural spine, shown in blue. H. Muscles inserting on the ansa costotransversaria (“cervical rib loop”), shown in brown. Specifically: A. M. longus colli dorsalis. B. M. cervicalis ascendens. C. M. flexor colli lateralis. D. M. flexor colli medialis. E. M. longus colli ventralis. In birds, this muscle originates from the processes carotici, which are absent in the vertebrae of sauropods. F. Mm. intercristales. G. Mm. interspinales. H. Mm. intertransversarii. Vertebrae modified from Gilmore (1936, plate 24).

Figure 6. Basic cervical vertebral architecture in archosaurs, in posterior and lateral views. 1, seventh cervical vertebra of a turkey, Meleagris gallopavo Linnaeus, 1758, traced from photographs by MPT. 2, fifth cervical vertebra of the abelisaurid theropod Majungasaurus crenatissimus Depéret, 1896,UA 8678, traced from O’Connor (2007, figures 8 and 20). In these taxa, the epipophyses and cervical ribs are aligned with the expected vectors of muscular forces. The epipophyses are both larger and taller than the neural spine, as expected based on their mechanical importance. The posterior surface of the neurapophysis is covered by a large rugosity, which is interpreted as an interspinous ligament scar like that of birds (O’Connor, 2007). Because this scar covers the entire posterior surface of the neurapophysis, it leaves little room for muscle attachments to the spine. 3, fifth cervical vertebra of Alligator mississippiensis Daudin, 1801, MCZ 81457, traced from 3D scans by Leon Claessens, courtesy of MCZ. Epipophyses are absent. 4, eighth cervical vertebra of Giraffatitan brancai(Janensch, 1914) paralectotype HMN SII, traced from Janensch (1950, figures 43 and 46). Abbreviations: cr, cervical rib; e, epipophysis; ns, neural spine; poz, postzygapophysis.

Figure 7. Disparity of sauropod cervical vertebrae. 1, Apatosaurus “laticollis” Marsh, 1879b holotype YPM 1861, cervical ?13, now referred to Apatosaurus ajax (see McIntosh, 1995), in posterior and left lateral views, after Ostrom and McIntosh (1966, plate 15); the portion reconstructed in plaster (Barbour, 1890, figure 1) is grayed out in posterior view; lateral view reconstructed after Apatosaurus louisae Gilmore, 1936 (Gilmore, 1936, plate XXIV). 2, “Brontosaurus excelsus” Marsh, 1879a holotype YPM 1980, cervical 8, now referred to Apatosaurus excelsus (see Riggs, 1903), in anterior and left lateral views, after Ostrom and McIntosh (1966, plate 12); lateral view reconstructed after Apatosaurus louisae (Gilmore, 1936, plate XXIV). 3, “Titanosaurus” colberti Jain and Bandyopadhyay, 1997 holotype ISIR 335/2, mid-cervical vertebra, now referred to Isisaurus (See Wilson and Upchurch, 2003), in posterior and left lateral views, after Jain and Bandyopadhyay (1997, figure 4). 4, “Brachiosaurus” brancai paralectotype HMN SII, cervical 8, now referred to Giraffatitan (see Taylor, 2009), in posterior and left lateral views, modified from Janensch (1950, figures 43–46). 5, Erketu ellisoniholotype IGM 100/1803, cervical 4 in anterior and left lateral views, modified from Ksepka and Norell (2006, figures 5a–d).

Figure 8. Sauropod cervical vertebrae showing anteriorly and posteriorly directed spurs projecting from neurapophyses. 1, cervical 5 of Sauroposeidon holotype OMNH 53062 in right lateral view, photograph by MJW. 2, cervical 9 of Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis holotype CCG V 20401 in left lateral view, reversed, from photograph by MPT. 3, cervical 7 or 8 of Omeisaurus junghsiensisYoung, 1939 holotype in right lateral view, after Young (1939, figure 2). (No specimen number was assigned to this material, which has since been lost. D. W. E. Hone personal communication, 2008.)

Figure 9. Bifid presacral vertebrae of sauropods showing ligament scars and pneumatic foramina in the intermetapophyseal trough. 1, Apatosaurus sp. cervical vertebra OMNH 01341 in right posterodorsolateral view, photograph by MJW. 2, Camarasaurussp. dorsal vertebrae CM 584 in dorsal view, photograph by MJW. Abbreviations: las, ligament attachment site; pfa, pneumatic fossa; pfo, pneumatic foramen.

Figure 10. Real and speculative muscle attachments in sauropod cervical vertebrae. 1, the second through seventeenth cervical vertebrae of Euhelopus zdanskyi Wiman, 1929 cotype specimen PMU R233a-δ(“Exemplar a”). 2, cervical 14 as it actually exists, with prominent but very short epipophyses and long cervical ribs. 3, cervical 14 as it would appear with short cervical ribs. The long ventral neck muscles would have to attach close to the centrum. 4, speculative version of cervical 14 with the epipophyses extended posteriorly as long bony processes. Such processes would allow the bulk of both the dorsal and ventral neck muscles to be located more posteriorly in the neck, but they are not present in any known sauropod or other non-avian dinosaur. Modified from Wiman (1929, plate 3).

Figure 11. Archosaur cervical vertebrae in posterior view, Showing muscle attachment points in phylogenetic context. Blue arrows indicate epaxial muscles attaching to neural spines, red arrows indicate epaxial muscles attaching to epipophyses, and green arrows indicate hypaxial muscles attaching to cervical ribs. While hypaxial musculature anchors consistently on the cervical ribs, the principle epaxial muscle migrate from the neural spine in crocodilians to the epipophyses in non-avial theropods and modern birds, with either or both sets of muscles being significant in sauropods. 1, fifth cervical vertebra of Alligator mississippiensis, MCZ 81457, traced from 3D scans by Leon Claessens, courtesy of MCZ. Epipophyses are absent. 2, eighth cervical vertebra of Giraffatitan brancai paralectotype HMN SII, traced from Janensch (1950, figures 43 and 46). 3, eleventh cervical vertebra of Camarasaurus supremus, reconstruction within AMNH 5761/X, “cervical series I”, modified from Osborn and Mook (1921, plate LXVII). 4, fifth cervical vertebra of the abelisaurid theropod Majungasaurus crenatissimus,UA 8678, traced from O’Connor (2007, figures 8 and 20). 5, seventh cervical vertebra of a turkey, Meleagris gallopavo, traced from photographs by MPT.
Figures from the preprint
Three of the figures changed between the version of the paper that was posted as a preprint on arXiv and the final published version on PeerJ. The figures shown above are the final published versions. Here are the full-resolution versions of the three arXiv figures that were subsequently changed.
Figure 1 originally included Deinocheirus, which was subsequently excised from the paper at the editor’s request. Tanystropheus was added. The original figure’s human skull, giraffe, ostrich, Paraceratherium, Therizinosaurus and Gigantoraptor were all copyright-encumbered, so were replaced by versions that can be distributed under CC BY.

Original Figure 1. Necks of long-necked non-sauropods, to the same scale. The giraffe and Paraceratherium are the longest necked mammals; the ostrich is the longest necked extant bird; Therizinosaurus, Deinocheirus and Gigantoraptor are the longest necked representatives of the three long-necked theropod clades and Arambourgiania is the longest necked pterosaur. Arambourgiania scaled from Zhejiangopterusmodified from Witton and Naish (2008, figure 1). Other image sources as for Figure 2. Alternating pink and blue bars are one meter in height.
Similarly, Figure 2 originally included Deinocheirus, which was subsequently excised and Tanystropheus added. The original Paraceratherium, Therizinosaurus and Gigantoraptor. being copyright-encumbered, were replaced by versions that can be distributed under CC BY.

Original Figure 2. Full skeletal reconstructions of selected long-necked non-sauropods, to the same scale. 1, Paraceratherium, modified from Granger and Gregory (1936, figure 47). 2, Therizinosaurus, scaled from Nanshiungosaurus modified from Paul (1997, p. 145). 3, Deinocheirus, scaled from Struthiomimus modified from Osborn (1916, plate XXVI). 4, Gigantoraptor, modified from Xu el al. (2007, figure 1). 5. Elasmosaurus, modified from Cope (1870, plate II, figure 1). Scale bar = 2 m.
In the original figure 3, sauropod necks from various sources were used. We replaced these with Scott Hartman’s reconstructions (except for Hatcher’s Diplodocus) partly for consistency and partly to avoid copyright encumbrance.

Original Figure 3. Necks of long-necked sauropods, to the same scale. Diplodocus, modified from elements in Hatcher (1901, plate 3), represents a “typical” long-necked sauropod, familiar from many mounted skeletons in museums. Puertasaurus modified from Wedel (2007a, figure 4-1). Sauroposeidon scaled from Brachiosaurus artwork by Dmitry Bogdanov, via commons.wikimedia.org (CC-BY-SA). Mamenchisaurus modified from Young and Zhao (1972, figure 4). Supersaurus scaled from Diplodocus, as above. Alternating pink and blue bars are one meter in width. Inset shows Figure 1 to the same scale.
x
September 28, 2012 at 8:22 am
[…] on Facebook, where Darren posted a note about our new paper, most of the discussion has not been about its content but about where it was published. […]
September 28, 2012 at 8:26 am
[…] Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. We have assembled related information over on this page, including full-resolution versions of all the […]
February 19, 2013 at 10:16 am
[…] chapter 4 (the Brontomerus description) was in Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, and now chapter 5 (neck anatomy) is in PeerJ. I’m pretty happy with the selection of venues there: I’m pleased to have […]
February 21, 2013 at 9:24 am
[…] Mike: There are plenty of historical SV-POW! posts that could have been PeerJ articles on their own — for example, the shish-kebab post that ended up as part of Why Giraffes Have Short Necks. […]
March 27, 2013 at 11:20 am
[…] read the SV-POW! posts on giraffe and sauropods necks (here, here, here, here), including the latest post and the paper it deals with (Taylor & Wedel 2013 – Yay for open access at PeerJ!). In it, […]
March 27, 2013 at 11:20 am
[…] Sauropodenhälse schon gelesen (hier, hier, hier, und hier), einschließlich des letzten Beitrags letzten Beitrags und des wissenschaftlichen Artikels dazu (Taylor & Wedel 2013 – ein Hurra für den freien […]
June 11, 2013 at 10:46 pm
[…] after that — on 3rd December, the day it opened to submissions — we sent in what became our neck anatomy paper. They turned it around quickly enough to be in the first batch of articles on 12 February this […]
December 13, 2013 at 7:52 pm
[…] publications in venues with impact factor zero (i.e. no impact factor at all). These include papers in new journals like PeerJ, in perfectly respectable established journals like PaleoBios, edited-volume chapters, papers in […]
February 12, 2014 at 9:53 am
[…] suffer, but that’s not been our experience: editing, reviewing, typesetting and proofing for our neck-anatomy paper were all up there with the best we’ve received […]
March 7, 2014 at 9:37 am
[…] day now, we’re going to send them back out. [Update, March 2014: those two papers became Taylor and Wedel (2013a) on sauropod neck anatomy and Wedel and Taylor (2013b) on caudal […]
March 8, 2014 at 9:13 am
[…] for Gigantoraptor. We don’t have a lot of that around here. It does crop up in Figure 1 of Taylor and Wedel (2013a), looking […]
March 17, 2014 at 9:24 am
[…] you crazy for the Taylor and Wedel (2013a) paper on why sauropods had long necks; and why giraffes have short necks, but disappointed that it’s not, until now, been obtainable in T-shirt […]
May 3, 2014 at 10:08 am
[…] blindly copied what I saw my colleagues doing without really thinking about it. One result is that our neck-anatomy paper was needlessly held up for more than four years. No-one benefits from these delays. They are a […]
May 3, 2014 at 10:09 am
[…] neck anatomy (eventually to be published in a very different form in PeerJ) at Paleobiology: five months and two […]
June 22, 2014 at 10:34 am
[…] We’ve covered a lot of ground this year, from the the frivolous to the ferociously technical, so it’s hard to pick favourites. But from my own very biased perspective, I particularly enjoyed all eight days of the extended Xenoposeidon week, a rather exhausting series of posts that may make Xeno the most blogged dinosaur on the Internet — or at least, the most blogged mid-to-posterior partial dorsal vertebra. Also noteworthy was Matt’s flagrant playing-to-the-gallery “showdown” and Darren’s observation of a newly recognised site of pneumaticity (which I want to cite in a paper but won’t be allowed to). [Note added 22 June 2014: I did indeed cite it in a paper.] […]
July 4, 2014 at 11:33 am
[…] Among the speakers is my own good self, and I will be talking about why giraffes are rubbish. […]
September 18, 2014 at 8:24 am
[…] does this mean? It means creationists can’t take our paper on sauropod neck anatomy, change it so that we seem to be advocating Intelligent Design, and post the result as though […]
January 29, 2015 at 9:59 pm
[…] Xing et al. didn’t discuss this (and not only because it would probably have meant citing our paper!) Their new beast seems to have some genuinely new and interesting morphology which is worthy of a […]
April 17, 2015 at 2:37 am
[…] If you’re like me, you don’t count sheep when you fall asleep, you count laminae. These struts of bone and their affiliated fossae connect and span between major structural features on vertebral neural arches such as prezygapophyses, postzygapophyses, parapophyses, diapophyses, hyposphenes, hypantra, and the neural spine. Presumably, laminae bracket and fossae house outgrowths of pneumatic diverticula from the respiratory system, which has been covered extensively on this blog in sauropodomorph dinosaurs. […]
June 3, 2015 at 6:07 pm
[…] last few posts. But that work petered out as I started working more on other specimens and on the problems of the sauropod neck. More recently, Paul and Phil hunkered down and got the nitty-gritty […]
September 19, 2015 at 8:41 am
[…] back many years. (We briefly discussed the problem, if only to throw our hands up in despair, in our 2013 neck-anatomy paper.) We didn’t land on the combat hypothesis because it’s cool, but because it’s […]
February 1, 2018 at 8:39 pm
[…] at that thing. It’s ridiculous. In our 2013 PeerJ paper “Why Giraffes have Short Necks” (Taylor and Wedel 2013), we included a “freak […]
June 22, 2018 at 8:17 pm
[…] Sanders, and recycled the trace for my 2007 prosauropod paper, and recycled the stack-o-C10s for my 2013 PeerJ paper with Mike. So for better or worse C10 is my mental shorthand for A. louisae, the same way that […]
July 6, 2018 at 8:58 am
[…] you could say it’s my first real paper since the annus mirabilis of 2013 when Matt and I had four good, solid papers come out in a single year. My CV lists five papers between then and now, but a […]
March 17, 2019 at 9:45 pm
[…] We caught up with some old friends. Here Mike is showing an entirely normal and healthy level of excitement about meeting CM 584, a specimen of Camarasaurus from Sheep Creek, Wyoming. You may recognize this view of these dorsals from Figure 9 in our 2013 PeerJ paper. […]
December 24, 2020 at 3:05 pm
[…] based on a 2013 paper written with Matt Wedel, which itself goes back through many years slow gestation, originating in a discussion on a car […]
April 30, 2021 at 9:43 pm
[…] The sauropod neck gallery used as Figure 3 in my and Matt’s 2013 PeerJ paper “why giraffes have short necks”. […]
April 13, 2022 at 11:31 am
[…] have long intended to write a paper entitled Why Elephants Are So Small, as a companion piece to Why Giraffes Have Short Necks (Taylor and Wedel 2013). I’ve often discussed this project with Matt, usually under the acronym WEASS, and its […]